Montiez

(PC) Littleton v. Montiez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20222:22-cv-00700California643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, No. 2:22-cv-0700 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARK MONTIEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 3, 2022, plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. However, on the same day, two filings by plaintiff were entered on the court docket. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.) Both documents are filed on state court forms with the state court caption crossed out, and neither document is signed by plaintiff. (Id.) Subsequently, plaintiff filed two more documents which are not signed by plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 15, 15-1.) Plaintiff is advised that all documents submitted to the court must bear his signature. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Further, in all of these filings, it appears that plaintiff attempts to bring criminal charges, 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.