Savage

(PC) Arceo v. Savage

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20222:11-cv-02396California1,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ARCEO, No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SOCORRO SALINAS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motion concerning the settlement of this action is before the court. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion should be denied. Background On August 3, 2021, the parties settled this action on the record, and agreed that because the county could not agree to make the check payable to plaintiff’s mother, and had no objection to plaintiff’s plan to subsequently endorse the check over to his mother, the check would be payable to plaintiff. Subsequently, plaintiff filed a motion claiming that trust account officers wrongfully cashed the check plaintiff endorsed “pay to the order of Sylvia Arceo,” and he requests an order from the court withdrawing the settlement of this action or ordering the Department of State Hospitals at Coalinga to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.