Jacobo

Jacobo v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20221:22-cv-00672California2,812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRACIELA JACOBO, No. 1:22-cv-00672-DAD-BAK (BAM) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

JOHN DOE, FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Defendant. (Doc. No. 7) 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff Graciela Jacobo’s motion for expedited discovery. (Doc. No. 7.) Defendant John Doe has not yet been identified and has not appeared in this action. Having considered plaintiff’s motion1, and for the reasons that follow, the court will grant in part and deny in part plaintiff’s motion for expedited discovery.

In its June 7, 2022 order granting a temporary restraining order, this court directed plaintiff to file a motion for expedited discovery. (Doc. No. 6 at 13.) Because the pending motion is closely connected to the temporary restraining order, the undersigned finds it appropriate to also consider and rule upon the pending motion. See, e.g., ZG TOP Tech. Co.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.