Oliver
ArcBest II, Inc. v. Oliver
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ArcBest II, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00627-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Nicholas Oliver, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff asks this court to alter or amend its judgment. For the following reason, the motion is denied. IT. BACKGROUND Plaintiff ArcBest II, Inc., which does business as “U-Pack,” is a “federally licensed . . . property broker and freight forwarder.” First Am. Compl. (FAC) § 17, ECF No. 11. It provides 22 containers for its “do-it-yourself moving service.” Jd. § 31. U-Pack alleges it would start 23 offering intrastate moving services in California if not for the threat of “enforcement actions and 24 penalties” under the Household Movers Act, California Business & Professions Code § 19225 et seq. Id. 49. Plaintiff brought a claim asserting the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) preempts the Household Movers…