Acevedo

Acevedo v. Russell Cellular, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20221:20-cv-01440California7,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO ACEVEDO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01440-JLT-SAB 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING GRANTING v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

RUSSELL CELLULAR, INC., ORDER VACATING JUNE 22, 2022

HEARING Defendant. (ECF Nos. 42, 44, 45, 47)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Defendant Russel Cellular, Inc.’s motion to dismiss this action for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court’s orders, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 42.) The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(7). The Court, having reviewed the moving papers, the lack of an opposition brief, and the Court’s record, finds the matter suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.