Stevens

(PC) Kamali v. Stevens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20221:19-cv-01432California1,495 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARBI KAMALI, 1:19-cv-01432-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO FILE SURREPLY

vs. (ECF No. 45.)

STEVENS, et al.,

Defendants.

18 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Arbi Kamali (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s claims for retaliation and excessive force against defendants correctional officers Rose Stevens, Ivan Villegas, Jordan Bryan, and Alen Hernandez (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 16.) On March 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a request for leave to respond to a new issue that Defendants raised in their reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF No. 45.) On March 23, 2022, Defendants filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 46.) Plaintiff has not filed a reply to the opposition, and the time in which to do so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.