Mlodzianowski

Mlodzianowski v. Markus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20222:21-cv-01295California732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH MLODZIANOWSKI, No. 2:21-cv-1295 JAM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRIAN MARKUS, Defendant. 16 On May 26, 2022, defendant filed a motion to compel together with the parties’ Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on June 17, 2022, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 32.) Review of the Joint Statement finds the parties’ briefing inadequate and insufficient to resolve the parties’ dispute. In this regard, the undersigned certainly appreciates and encourages concise briefing, as evidenced by the undersigned’s Standard Information re discovery disputes found on to the court’s web page at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/judges/all-judges/united- states-magistrate-judge-deborah-barnes-db. That document explains that joint statements filed before the undersigned shall not exceed twenty-five pages, excluding exhibits. See 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.