(PC) Maldonado v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20222:21-cv-02172California491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BILLY RAE SHANEE MALDONADO, Case No. 2:21-cv-02172-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS THAT

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., DENIED AND HE BE DIRECTED TO

TENDER THE FILING FEE IN ORDER TO

Defendants. PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION ECF No. 2 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS

17 18 Plaintiff previously filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. After reviewing his litigation history, I concluded that he was a “three- striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 6. I also found that his

22 1 Plaintiff has filed at least three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim: (1) Maldonado v. Yates, No. 1:11-cv-01735-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. 2013); (2) Maldonado v. Trimble, No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.