(PC) Maldonado v. State of CA
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20222:21-cv-02172California491 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BILLY RAE SHANEE MALDONADO, Case No. 2:21-cv-02172-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., DENIED AND HE BE DIRECTED TO
TENDER THE FILING FEE IN ORDER TO
Defendants. PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION ECF No. 2 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS
17 18 Plaintiff previously filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. After reviewing his litigation history, I concluded that he was a “three- striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 6. I also found that his
22 1 Plaintiff has filed at least three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim: (1) Maldonado v. Yates, No. 1:11-cv-01735-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. 2013); (2) Maldonado v. Trimble, No.…