Chastaine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILL JOSEPH SERRIS, No. 2:22-cv-0434-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHAUNA CHASTAINE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and California law. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint filed on May 16, 2022 (ECF No. 12) is before the court for 22 screening.1 For the reasons set forth, the first amended complaint fails to state a federal claim. It is not clear whether plaintiff may be able to state a claim under the ADA against the County of Solano with the allegation of

1 A 16-point font is used for this screening order at plaintiff’s request. (ECF No. 1 at 27.) additional facts. However, it appears the defects with the other claims and defendants cannot be cured by amendment. Plaintiff will be granted…