Parks
(PC) Harris v. Parks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEVIN LEE HARRIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00429-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS CASE1
v.
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
E. PARKS, (Doc. No. 41) Defendant.
16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 41). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss the Third Amended Complaint under § 1915A for failure to state a claim. BACKGROUND AND OPERATIVE PLEADING Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed his initial civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 4, 2019. (Doc. No. 1). On April 16, 2020, after Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), the then-assigned magistrate judge screened the FAC, finding it failed to include sufficient detail to connect any defendant to a deprivation of any constitutional right. (Doc. No. 27 at 3). The Court also noted Plaintiff included several unrelated…