Bird

(PC) Cunningham v. Bird

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20221:22-cv-00306California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYSHUN CUNNINGHAM, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00306-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING

ACTION

BIRD, et al., ) ) (Doc. 9) Defendants. ) ) ) ) 17 The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 9.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff. The court advised Plaintiff that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff filed objections on June 8, 2022. (Doc. 12.) According to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.