Bickle

(PC) McDonald v. Bickle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20222:20-cv-00766California929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALVIN B. MCDONALD, No. 2:20-cv-0766 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. BICKLE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Claim One1 of the complaint. ECF No. 25. The motion has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 25, 29, 30, 31. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and that defendants’ motion accordingly be denied as moot. On April 15, 2022, after determining that plaintiff had likely been released from custody and that he had not notified the court of any change of address, the undersigned ordered plaintiff

On April 22, 2020, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.