(PC) Adams v. California Prison Industry Authority
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM ADAMS, Case No. 2:20-cv-01901-JDP (PC) Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. TO REFUND THE FILING FEE CALIFORNIA PRISON INDUSTRY
AUTHORITY,
15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously granted his request to proceed in forma pauperis, requiring him to pay the filing fee in monthly installments. ECF No. 8. On April 18, 2022, plaintiff notified the court that he was relocating out of state and requested that this this case to be dismissed. ECF No. 36. He also argues that defendant CalPIA should be responsible for paying the filing fee and that all charges on his trust account for this case be removed. If plaintiff does not want to pursue this action, he can voluntarily dismiss it without prejudice by filing a notice of dismissal in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A). However, even if he voluntarily dismisses…