Evans
Evans v. Jacobsen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNICE EVANS, individually and as No. 2:17-cv-01619-TLN-AC Successor in Interest to Decedent Angel Ramos; DANTE RAMOS; PHILLIP
WILSON-VAUGH; LEANN SANCHEZ;
DARCEL LEWIS; D.W., by and through his ORDER Guardian Ad Litem, CARITA WILSON; ALICIA SADDLER, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for minor G.W., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 CITY OF VALLEJO; a municipal corporation; ZACH JACOBSEN, Police Officer for the City of Vallejo; and Does 1– 50, individually and in their official capacities as Police Officers for the City of Vallejo, inclusive, Defendants. 22 This matter is before the Court on Annice Evans’ (“Evans” or “Plaintiff”) Motion to Certify Zach Jacobsen’s (“Jacobsen” or “Defendant”) Interlocutory Appeal as Frivolous. (ECF No. 58.) Defendant filed an opposition (ECF No. 61), and Plaintiff replied (ECF No. 63). For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby certifies Defendant’s appeal as frivolous and the Motion is GRANTED. 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…