Evans

Evans v. Jacobsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20222:17-cv-01619California2,078 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNICE EVANS, individually and as No. 2:17-cv-01619-TLN-AC Successor in Interest to Decedent Angel Ramos; DANTE RAMOS; PHILLIP

WILSON-VAUGH; LEANN SANCHEZ;

DARCEL LEWIS; D.W., by and through his ORDER Guardian Ad Litem, CARITA WILSON; ALICIA SADDLER, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for minor G.W., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 CITY OF VALLEJO; a municipal corporation; ZACH JACOBSEN, Police Officer for the City of Vallejo; and Does 1– 50, individually and in their official capacities as Police Officers for the City of Vallejo, inclusive, Defendants. 22 This matter is before the Court on Annice Evans’ (“Evans” or “Plaintiff”) Motion to Certify Zach Jacobsen’s (“Jacobsen” or “Defendant”) Interlocutory Appeal as Frivolous. (ECF No. 58.) Defendant filed an opposition (ECF No. 61), and Plaintiff replied (ECF No. 63). For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby certifies Defendant’s appeal as frivolous and the Motion is GRANTED. 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.