Haaland

(PS) Ramirez v. Haaland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20222:19-cv-00845California4,302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DON EPIGMENIO RAMIREZ, No. 2:19-CV-0845-DMC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID BERNHARDT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); see also ECF No. 19 (order reassigning case). 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant David Bernhardt’s (Secretary of the 22 Department of Interior) motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 26. Plaintiff appears to oppose 23 the motion with responses to the declarations Defendant filed. See ECF Nos. 30, 31, and 33. In 24 Plaintiff’s responses he admits undisputed facts and denies disputed facts. See generally id. 25 With each denial Plaintiff explains why the fact is disputed. See generally id. While he does fail 26 to cite to evidence, he does sign his responses under the penalty of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.