Hodgson

Hodgson v. Roper

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20222:20-cv-00650California1,144 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Eric Hodgson, No. 2:20-cv-00650-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Randle Roper, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 In a previous order, this court dismissed Eric Hodgson’s second amended complaint without leave to amend and granted the defendants’ motion for sanctions against Hodgson and his 19 attorney, Thomas Barth. Prev. Order (Feb. 1, 2022), ECF No. 42. Hodgson and Barth now move 20 for reconsideration of the sanctions order. See generally Mot., ECF No. 43. The defendants oppose the motion, see generally Opp’n, ECF No. 45, and Hodgson replied, see generally Reply, ECF No. 49. The court submitted the matter without oral arguments. Min. Order, ECF No. 47. “As long as a district court has jurisdiction over the case, then it possesses the inherent 24 procedural power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to be sufficient.” City of L.A., Harbor Div.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.