(SS) Ingraham v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20221:22-cv-00720California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL DAVID INGRAHAM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00720-BAM

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

LONG FORM APPLICATION TO PROCEED

v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 2)

Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

16 17 On June 14, 2022, Plaintiff Michael David Ingraham (“Plaintiff”), through counsel, filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s application is insufficient for the Court to determine if he is entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action. Notably, Plaintiff has reported income from an Adoption Assistance Program in the amount of $3,771.00 per month. (Id. at 1.) This amounts to an annual income of $45,252.00 ($3,771.00 x 12 months). Plaintiff also identifies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.