Sarnowski

Sarnowski v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20221:21-cv-01568California164 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JOSEPH SARNOWSKI, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01568-JLT-BAK (SKO) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER CLOSING THE CASE ) v. ) (Doc. 18) ) SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, )

INC.,

) ) Defendant. )

The parties have stipulated to the action, including all claims and counterclaims, being dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. (Doc. 18.) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately without further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated: June 15, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27 28