Travelers Property Casualty Ins. Co. v. Sugar Bowl Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY No. 2:20-cv-00654-TLN-AC
INSURANCE COMPANY,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 SUGAR BOWL CORPORATION, a California Corporation, and DOES 1-20,
INCLUSIVE,
16 Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Sugar Bowl Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 6.) Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 8.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 6.) /// /// /// /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff is an insurance business and provided a policy to its insured, Celia Cummings (“Cummings”) for her residence located at 880 Fiddleneck Place in Nordon, California. (ECF No. 1-1 at 2–3.) Defendant manages a ski resort in Placer County, which includes the Sugar Bowl Village (“Village”) comprised of several…