Soltanian

(PC) Shockner v. Soltanian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20222:18-cv-01948California679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANFRED SHOCKNER, No. 2:18-cv-01948-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLTANIAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 18, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 125.) Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 129.) The magistrate judge recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant Smith approved Defendant Soltanian-Zadeh’s decision to discontinue Plaintiff’s methadone as barred by the statue of limitations be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.