Arceo
Arceo v. City of Roseville
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20222:20-cv-02334California3,117 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
|\poRTER scoTT || APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION William E. Camy, SBN 291397 3 || Megan N. Robertson, SBN 340235 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ROSEVILLE, GARY SMITH, CURTIS WATKINS, ADRIAN COGHLAN,
BRIAN LEWIS, DANIEL TIMONEY, DERRICK PHELPS, JAMES HAGGERTY, LEE HENDRICK, SETH
ADDINGTON, and JAMES MACCOUN g Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code section 6103 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] 12 ALEJANDRO ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-2334 TLN DB 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER