Arceo

Arceo v. City of Roseville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20222:20-cv-02334California3,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

|\poRTER scoTT || APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION William E. Camy, SBN 291397 3 || Megan N. Robertson, SBN 340235 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ROSEVILLE, GARY SMITH, CURTIS WATKINS, ADRIAN COGHLAN,

BRIAN LEWIS, DANIEL TIMONEY, DERRICK PHELPS, JAMES HAGGERTY, LEE HENDRICK, SETH

ADDINGTON, and JAMES MACCOUN g Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code section 6103 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] 12 ALEJANDRO ARCEO, No. 2:20-cv-2334 TLN DB 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

FOR CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, GARY SMITH,

CURTIS WATKINS, ADRIAN COGHLAN,

BRIAN LEWIS, DANIEL TIMONEY, DARRYL

17 || LOPEZ, DERRICK PHELPS, JAMES

HAGGERTY, LEE HENDRICK, SETH

ADDINGTON, JAMES MACCOUN, COUNTY

OF PLACER, DEVON BELL, DAVID

POWERS, CALIFORNIA FORENSIC

MEDICAL GROUP, INCORPORATED,

ASHLEY JOEL PILGRIM, M.D., …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.