(HC) Johnson v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20222:22-cv-00536California769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW D. JOHNSON, No. 2:22-cv-0536 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed March 25, 2022, petitioner was directed to either file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $5.00 filing fee for habeas petitions. ECF No. 9. He was further cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 1. Petitioner responded to the order by saying that he did not have the money to pay the $350.00 filing fee. ECF No. 10. The court then clarified the applicable filing fee and granted petitioner thirty days to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. ECF No. 11. Petitioner was again advised that failure to comply would result in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.