Erasmus

Erasmus v. Andrea Tse M.D. Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20222:21-cv-01149California5,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MEGAN D. ERASMUS,

Plaintiff, No. 2:21-cv-01149-TLN-KJN v.

ANDREA TSE M.D., INC., ORDER

Defendant.

15 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Andrea Tse M.D., Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff Megan Erasmus (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 9.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 4.) /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 The instant case arises out of Plaintiff’s alleged inability to access videos on Defendant’s website. Plaintiff is completely deaf and relies entirely on closed captioning to consume audio content such as movies, videos, or tutorials. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Defendant owns or operates Folsom Plastic Surgery Optimal U Aesthetic Skin and Wellness Center (the “Clinic”) and owned or operated its website,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.