Cisneros
(PC) Kidwell v. Cisneros
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SEQUOYAH DESERTHAWK KIDWELL, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00290-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE SCREENING
ORDER ISSUED ON MAY 13, 2022
THERESA CISNEROS, et al., ) ) (Doc. 15) Defendants. ) ) )
17 The Magistrate Judge screened the complaint filed in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ¶ 1915A, provided the applicable legal standards, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff filed objections to the court’s May 13, 2022 order, which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (Doc. 15.) Pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[o]n motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party ... from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence ... (3) fraud 25 …