Cisneros

(PC) Kidwell v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20221:22-cv-00290California470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEQUOYAH DESERTHAWK KIDWELL, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00290-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE SCREENING

ORDER ISSUED ON MAY 13, 2022

THERESA CISNEROS, et al., ) ) (Doc. 15) Defendants. ) ) )

17 The Magistrate Judge screened the complaint filed in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ¶ 1915A, provided the applicable legal standards, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff filed objections to the court’s May 13, 2022 order, which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration. (Doc. 15.) Pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[o]n motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party ... from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence ... (3) fraud 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.