Weekly

Weekly v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20221:22-cv-00341California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANKLIN BIRL WEEKLY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00341-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE DEFENDANTS

v. CITY OF FRESNO AND COUNTY OF

FRESNO AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 13)

16 On June 15, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of Defendants City of Fresno and County of Fresno, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (ECF No. 13.) Defendants United States of American ad the California Department of Public Health are not addressed in the filing. Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims— through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); but see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.