Hansber

Hansber v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20221:21-cv-00022California3,387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SHAHARA HANSBER, NANG CHAN, CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00022-AWI-SAB and JESUS MORENO, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, ORDER ON FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiffs, 9 v. (Doc. No. 44) 10 ULTA BEAUTY COSMETICS, LLC; and DOES 1-100,

Defendants

13 14 Plaintiffs Shahara Hansber, Nang Chan, and Jesus Moreno initiated this action by filing a Class Action Complaint against Defendant Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC for damages, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, and restitution. The matter was referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. On December 17, 2021, Defendant filed a motion to join staffing agency employers Exact Staff, Inc. (“Exact”) and Spherion Staffing LLC (“Spherion”) as necessary parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(a). Doc. No. 33. Plaintiffs filed an opposition on January 10,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.