Montiez

(PC) Littleton v. Montiez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20222:22-cv-00700California969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LITTLETON, No. 2:22-cv-0700 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARK MONTIEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 3, 2022, plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. However, on June 6, 2022, apparently prior to receiving the June 3, 2022 order, plaintiff filed a document entitled “6/6/22 Proof of Service,” but is captioned “Littleton v. Next Door Residents.” (ECF No. 20.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s filing is dismissed and plaintiff is granted an extension of time to file an amended complaint that complies with the June 3, 2022 order. To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must demonstrate: (1) the violation of a federal constitutional or statutory right; and (2) that the violation was committed by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.