Hicks
(PC) Ardds v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
v. ORDER HICKS, et al., (ECF No. 89) Defendants. ORDER EXTENDING DISPOSITIVE
MOTION DEADLINE
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Hicks, Amaya, Alcantar, McIntyre, Baylon, and Sanchez for failure to protect Plaintiff from an alleged assault by Inmate Hall on November 9, 2017, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. I. Procedural History Pursuant to the Court’s February 11, 2021 discovery and scheduling order, the deadline for completion of all discovery was set for October 11, 2021. (ECF No. 65.) The deadline for filing motions for summary…