Coleman

Coleman v. Twilight Haven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20221:21-cv-01713California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIRLEY COLEMAN, No. 1:21-cv-01713-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION

TO REMAND AND REMANDING ACTION

TWILIGHT HAVEN, INC., et al., TO FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Defendant.

17 This matter was removed to this court from the Fresno County Superior Court on December 3, 2021 by defendant Twilight Haven, Inc. on the basis of federal officer jurisdiction and federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 247d-6d and 247d-6e (2006). (Doc. No. 1.) On January 18, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action to the Fresno County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 14.) While that motion was pending before the court, the Ninth Circuit issued its decisions in Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, 27 F.4th 679 (9th Cir. 2022) and Martin v. Filart, No. 20-56067, 2022 WL 576012 (9th Cir. Feb. 25, 2022), in which the Ninth Circuit 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.