Fisher

(HC) Bisel v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20221:17-cv-00013California16,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, No. 1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF

v. HABEAS CORPUS RAY FISHER, JR., [THIRTY DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a registered sex offender and state parolee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He raises numerous claims challenging a conviction sustained in Fresno County Superior Court. As discussed below, the Court finds the claims to be without merit and recommends the petition be DENIED. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 10, 2014, a Fresno County jury found Petitioner guilty of two counts of annoying or molesting a minor, with a prior felony conviction (Cal. Penal Code § 647.6(c)). (Doc. 31 at 1.1) In a bifurcated trial, the court found true the allegations that Petitioner had suffered one prior strike conviction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.