Beck
(PS) De Volksbank N.V. v. Beck
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE VOLKSBANK N.V. fka SNS REGIO No. 2:19-cv-0043 MCE DB PS
BANK N.V.,
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. NICHOLAS GEORGE BECK, an individual, and ANGELIQUE VERSCHUUR, an individual, Defendants. 18 Defendants Nicholas George Beck and Angelique Verschuur are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are plaintiff’s motions to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for an order requiring defendants to file an amended answer. (ECF Nos. 37 & 38.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion to dismiss be granted, defendants be granted leave to amend, and plaintiff’s motion for an order requiring defendants to file an amended answer be denied. //// //// FACTUAL BACKGROUND …