(HC)Brown

(HC)Brown v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20222:21-cv-01816California330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BREYON BROWN, No. 2:21-cv-1816 TLN DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAUL THOMPSON, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner, proceeds without counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By order filed April 12, 2022, the undersigned screened the petition and notified petitioner it plainly appeared the petition was subject to dismissal because the claim presented is unripe and because petitioner did not exhaust administrative remedies. Petitioner was granted 30 days to file an amended petition. (ECF No. 6.) The 30 period has expired, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the April 12, 2022 screening order (ECF No. 6), IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) be dismissed; and 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.