Muthana

Gilbert v. Muthana

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20221:21-cv-01333California6,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01333-JLT-SKO 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED

v. IN PART

(Doc. 12) MOHAMMED MUTHANA and SALEH MUTHANA, OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS Defendants.

_________________________________ ___/

18 On January 24, 2022, Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Mohammed Muthana (“Mohammed”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) (the “Motion”). (Doc. 12). No opposition to the Motion was filed. (See Docket.) After having reviewed the papers and supporting material, the matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(g), and the Court vacated the hearing set for February 23, 2022. (Doc. 16.) On April 8, 2022, the undersigned issued findings and a 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.