Bal

(PC) Cox v. Bal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20222:22-cv-00804California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE COX, JR., No. 2:22-cv-0804-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BAL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 17, 2022, the court found that plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) within thirty days. Id. The court also warned plaintiff that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.