Dyer

Dyer v. City of Auburn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20222:21-cv-02182California6,084 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DALTON EDWARD DYER, No. 2:21-cv-02182-JAM-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

CITY OF AUBURN, et. al, MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants. 15 I. BACKGROUND1 This action arises from an October 12, 2018, incident in which Dalton Edward Dyer (“Plaintiff”) alleges City of Auburn Police Officers Joshua Eagan (“Eagan”) and Matthew Nichols (“Nichols”) wrongfully detained, searched, beat, tased, and arrested him. See First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 9. That day, Plaintiff was riding in the passenger seat of a friend’s vehicle when Officer Eagan arrested the friend on a suspected DUI. Id. ¶ 13. After Eagan placed the friend in his patrol vehicle, Plaintiff asked for permission to speak to his friend,

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.