Ward
(PC) Cantu v. Ward
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA JESSE CANTU, Case No. 1:20-cv-00386-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
P. WARD, ET. AL., DENY PLAINTIFF’S CONSTRUED
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
Defendants. INJUNCTION AND TO AMEND THE
PLEADINGS1
16 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 17 (Doc. No. 48) 18 19 Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order and to amend the pleadings filed February 28, 2022. (Doc. No. 48). Defendants filed a response in opposition to the motion on March 14, 2022. (Doc. No. 49). The undersigned denies the motion for a protective order and recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s construed motion for preliminary injunction and motion to amend. //// 26 1 The undersigned submits these factual findings and recommendations to the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 (E.D. Cal. 2022).