Newsom
(PC) De La Cruz v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 JOSE MIGUEL DE LA CRUZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00997-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 OSCAR GALLOWAY, et al., (ECF No. 49)
Defendants.
17 Jose Miguel Da Le Cruz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 49). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel; because his imprisonment will greatly limit his ability to litigate; because the issues involved in this case are complex; because this case will require significant research and investigation; because Plaintiff has limited knowledge of the law; because Plaintiff only has a “6.2 level of education;” because this case will likely involve conflicting testimony, and counsel would better enable Plaintiff to 26 …