(PS) Houhoulas v. CalTrans HR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20222:22-cv-00413California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN HOUHOULAS, No. 2:22-cv-0413 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION HUMAN

RESOURCES, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff John Houhoulas is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff commenced this action on March 4, 2022, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On June 21, 2022, defendants California State Personnel Board and Jennifer Maly filed an ex parte application for an order extending the time to respond to plaintiff’s complaint to July 22, 2022. (ECF No. 5.) Therein, defendants state that they believe the complaint was served on June 2 or June 4, 2022. (Id. at 3.) The time for responding to the complaint has not yet passed. (Id. at 4.) Defendants, however, are seeking additional time to evaluate the complaint’s 16 claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.