(SS) Gabriel v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5 6 TRENTON LYDDEL GABRIEL CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00390-GSA

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting SUMMARY JUDGMENT Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

14 Defendant moves for an unopposed 35-day extension of time to August 4, 2022 to file a 15 response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment due to counsel’s workload. This is 16 Defendant’s first extension. 17 When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider 18 the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking 19 the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant 20 Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV- 21 01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent 22 power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious…