Newsom

(HC) Harris v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20222:21-cv-02124California266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN HARRIS, No. 2:21-CV-2124-KJM-DMC-P Petitioner, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition challenges a conviction and/or sentence issued by the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). Because any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of Petitioner's application are more readily available in Los Angeles County, which is within the boundaries of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, this matter should be transferred to that court. See id. at 499 n.15. / /…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.