Hill

(HC) Wade v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20222:22-cv-00556California485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHANCELLOR WADE, No. 2:22-cv-00556-WBS-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER RICK HILL, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 26, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. In his objections, petitioner argues that the Magistrate Judge mischaracterized his claims. He contends that his claim does not rest on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.