Davidson

Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 24, 20221:22-cv-00581California648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREVON FOREMAN and LOTISHA Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-DAD-BAK (SKO)

DAVIDSON,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDED FOR DISMISSAL FOR

PLAINTIFF FOREMAN’S FAILURE TO

v. COMPLY WITH THE COURTS ORDER

(Doc. 4)

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF

BAKERSFIELD, 21-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

17 _____________________________________/

19 Plaintiffs Trevon Foreman and Lotisha Davidson (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in this action. Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Defendant District Attorney of Bakersfield on May 16, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff Foreman, a state prisoner, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without prepayment of fees. (Doc. 2.) On May 20, 2022, the undersigned issued an order finding that Plaintiff Foreman failed to submit to the Court a certified copy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.