Rodriguez

(PC) Crane v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 27, 20222:15-cv-00208California2,126 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD J. CRANE, No. 2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s fully-briefed motion for injunctive relief is before the court. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion should be denied. Plaintiff’s Allegations This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against defendants Davey, Rodriguez, Robinette, Barton, Probst and Weeks. (ECF No. 16.) The court found plaintiff stated potentially cognizable First and Eighth Amendment claims for relief based on plaintiff’s allegations that such defendants conspired to violate his civil rights while plaintiff was incarcerated at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”). (ECF No. 26 at 6.) Plaintiff alleges that on multiple occasions from December 31, 2009, to March 1, 2013, defendants set him up for assault by inmates Washington,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.