Warnke

(PC) Irigoyen v. Warnke

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20221:22-cv-00483California810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY RAYMOND IRIGOYEN, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00483-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

VERNON H. WARNKE, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ) PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED ) ) (ECF Nos.4, 5) )

Plaintiff Anthony Raymond Irigoyen is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on April 25, 2022. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 4, 5.) I. LEGAL STANDARD 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to bring a civil action “without prepayment of fees or security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.