(PC) Granderson v. California Corrections Rehabilitations

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID EARL GRANDERSON, No. 2:19-cv-2211 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS REHABILITATIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions and expenses. ECF No. 37. Plaintiff has not responded. I. Procedural History On January 7, 2022, defendant filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to interrogatories and requests for the production on the ground that plaintiff had completely failed to respond. ECF No. 27. After plaintiff failed to respond to the motion, he was given a second opportunity to do so, and cautioned that failure to respond would be deemed a waiver of any opposition to granting the motion and could result in sanctions. ECF No. 29. After plaintiff once again failed to respond, the motion was granted…