Norris

(PC) Jordan v. Norris

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20221:20-cv-00467California7,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 LAMAR JORDAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00467-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

DENIED

E. ANUNCIACION, et al., (ECF No. 52) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS 16 I. INTRODUCTION Lamar Jordan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Napoles and Anunciacion (both of whom are dentists) for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment based on allegations that defendant Napoles failed to provide Plaintiff with dental care for pain and swelling, and that defendant Anunciacion refused to clean his mouth wound. (ECF Nos. 1, 12, & 41).1 On October 28, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on both claims. (ECF No. 52). On April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.