United States v. Approx. $2,248,973.86 seized from Citibank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20222:21-cv-01895California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1100

1111 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:21-cv-1895 KJM DB

1122 Plaintiff,

ORDER

1133 v.

1144 APPROXIMATELY $2,248,973.

SEIZED FROM CITIBANK ACCOUNT

1155 NUMBER 42026878480,

1 11 16 76

Defendant. 1188 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 1199 302(c)(19). On February 18, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 2200 were served on plaintiff. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations 2211 to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 2222 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 2233 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See 2244 Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate 2255 judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed 2266 the file, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.