Matteson

(HC) Stephen v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20222:20-cv-01003California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jimmie Stephen, No. 2:20-cv-1003-KJM-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER Warden G. Matteson, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Respondent filed a reply. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.