Cisneros
(PC) Harris v. Cisneros
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00721-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g)2 THERESA CISNEROS FICHES, JOHN DOE, CHARLES RETTIG STEVEN (Doc. No. 2) MUNCHIN, QUELITA S.
BOURGEOLE, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
16 Defendants. ORDER TO ASSIGN TO DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 Plaintiff Marvin Harris, a state prisoner initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the District Court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three dismissals that constitute strikes and the Complaint does not establish Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception.
1 It is difficult…