Jenkins

(PC) Strickland v. Jenkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20222:22-cv-00898California2,864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALCOLM STRICKLAND, No. 2:22-cv-0898 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. JENKINS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and finds plaintiff has stated one cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff will be given the opportunity to either file an amended complaint or proceed immediately on the cognizable claim in his current complaint.

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

24 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 25 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 26 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 27 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.